There's no one-size-fits-all for researchers to determine whether using publicly available data is appropriate, but there is certainly room for more discussion.
A new study finds that gender bias in book reviewing doesn't merely show up in which authors get reviewed more often—it affects authors who veer from common gendered stereotypes as well.
Defining rights for non-humans beyond bestowing them with “personhood” can only become more important as we learn more about animal cognition.
The techniques of jury consultants are unreliable, and often incentivize the use of lazy stereotypes.