The People Behind the Latest Issue of ‘Pacific Standard’: Dana Goldstein

Dana Goldstein reviews the long, strange history of testing and education science, from phrenology to today’s value-added measurement.

In “The Big Sort: Our Problematic Obsession in American Education With Ranking People,” Dana Goldstein reviews the long, strange history of testing and education science, from phrenology to today’s value-added measurement. In reporting her recent book, The Teacher Wars: A History of America’s Most Embattled Profession, Goldstein saw firsthand the sometimes absurd results of a culture obsessed with test-based ranking and sorting. “I witnessed first graders in Colorado who took a pencil-and-paper test in arts class,” she says. “A lot of the kids actually couldn’t read.” It’s not that testing in itself is bad, says Goldstein, a staff writer at the Marshall Project: “Classroom-level short term quizzes and short writing assignments, those are the sorts of tests that seem to drive gains for kids.” The year-end standardized tests that are used primarily to judge the performance of teachers? Not so much.

For more on the science of society, and to support our work, sign up for our free email newsletters and subscribe to our bimonthly magazine. Digital editions are available in the App Store (iPad) and on Google Play (Android) and Zinio (Android, iPad, PC/MAC, iPhone, and Win8).

Related Posts

The Trouble With Genius

Students diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome, a mild form of autism, perform as well as or better than their peers academically but, despite their large vocabularies, struggle with social interaction. The Koegel Autism Center, long a world leader on autism research, hopes to teach the students the art of conversation.
See More