Solving the Sign Problem for Gender-Neutral Bathrooms

One writer proposes a simple solution that shouldn't offend anyone.
Author:
Publish date:
Social count:
0
One writer proposes a simple solution that shouldn't offend anyone.
(Photo: Juanan Barros Moreno/Shutterstock)

(Photo: Juanan Barros Moreno/Shutterstock)

“But what would you put on the door?!” said a facility manager at an airport, his concern echoed by an administrator at a university: “When people are looking for a restroom, they look for the 'man' or 'woman' icon. It’s what we know to look for that means restroom.”

We can’t have gender-neutral bathrooms, you see, because there’s no symbol for it ... or is there?

This is the symbol used at the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs. Sam Killermann, the social justice activist at which the above statements were aimed, doesn’t prefer it. “Even if you’re familiar with gender identity and diversity,” he writes, “the literal interpretation of this image (a half “man” half “woman”) is a disconcerting representation of ‘gender neutral.’”

1-112

So, what is there to do?  Killermann has an innovative solution. “I had this breakthrough moment,” he writes, “where I was like, ‘If I was urgently in need of a toilet, what visual cue that a room contained a toilet could I use?’”

Tada!

2-1a4

“It’s really not that hard.”

Killermann wants us to replace all the man and woman signs on one-person, private public restrooms with this one—or with the British-inspired W.C., which he has decided stands for “who cares.” Print yours here.

This post originally appeared on Sociological Images, a Pacific Standard partner site, as “Gender Neutral Bathrooms: Solving the Sign Problem.”

Related