Media Coverage of Climate Change Is Caught in an Equilibrium Trap
The media outlets focused on climate change are centered in areas where the actual effects of climate change generally haven't become tangible.
The media outlets focused on climate change are centered in areas where the actual effects of climate change generally haven't become tangible.
Even as some observers were struck by the dire forecast, many others say that this is nothing new—and that national leaders will ignore it anyway.
The Trump administration is doing the opposite of what a new report says is needed to keep global climate change to a minimum.
As temperatures rise, mental health often declines, but researchers still don't know why.
There's a lack of diversity among those who create the world's "consensus documents" on climate change.
An IPCC author assails the current two-degree target as scientifically bankrupt and geographically biased.
Cities must play a critical role in shifting the world to a fossil fuel-free future. So why won't anybody help them?
We should continue to fight for new building codes and oppose the construction of new oil pipelines—and more ambitious projects still—but only because they offer hope and aspiration in the midst of despair, not because they will actually help at this point.