Journals

By resorting to satire, did Portland State University professor Peter Boghossian violate basic professional and ethical standards?

To relegate academic projects that seek to untangle the complexities of human systems to the realm of grievances is a farce—one that misses the point of the academic project in the first place.

An expansive new project is able to replicate results from fewer than half of its psychology experiments in question.

Academic publishing has been slow to make use of social media, but new experiments could push the industry—and science—forward.

New guidelines proposed by the National Institutes of Health have already been rejected by several major scientific journals.

Here's how to fix it.

In a field where success and true impact are often unquantifiable until years later, there's much debate over how to measure the quality of one's work.

The use of journal rankings to rate individual papers, scientists, and even programs has upset loads of people in academia. One paper's solution: Get rid of journals.

A lot of science's ills have been traced to the way it gets published. What if researchers laid out their dirty laundry before even donning a lab coat?

A look at the Journal of Visualized Experiments, the first journal devoted to publishing scientific research in a video format.

A new report, though focused specifically on medical journals, reminds us to maintain a healthy level of skepticism when interpreting any study's findings.