The rule would slash benefits for those families that do not quite meet the program's poverty threshold, but are still food insecure.
You asked, we listened. Now it's time to choose which story you want to see first.
A new study estimates that as many as 8.3 million kids are at risk of losing their benefits.
The roughly 40 million Americans who use food assistance programs are also helping to create jobs.
A new memo could have a chilling effect on both family-based immigration and participation in public-benefit programs.
Amid attacks on several food security programs from the Trump administration, this proposed change could ignite yet another debate about where we draw the line.
New analysis of federal data shows the largest single-year decrease in WIC's history. Participation is down in SNAP and the school lunch program too.
In a letter, the lawmakers urge the USDA to reconsider a proposed rule that would make it harder for able-bodied adults without children to receive food assistance.
SNAP has become more vulnerable under Trump. Alabama's law could test how far the administration is willing to go to destabilize the program.
The vast majority of poor, able-bodied adults without dependents using SNAP are employed—and for those who aren't, cracking down on benefits is not likely to help.
The rule will impede family-based immigration, but its perceived effects are already widespread—and perhaps even more dangerous.
The Trump administration wants to keep out immigrants who burden the American taxpayer. How big is that burden really?
Looking for answers in the research.